Meme posts are only permitted on Monday's.
Do not 'backseat moderate' - Report any rule breakers to moderators.Please remain respectful to users at all times.Do not post personal information (address, email, phone number, etc.).Blogspam, mobile links and URL shorteners (such as tinyurl or bit.ly) are not allowed.Do not post pirated content or promote it in any way.Comments or posts that are disrespectful or encourage harassment of others (including witch-hunts of any kind) are not allowed. list a font which should only be downloaded if one of the earlier fonts in the stack doesn't contain the needed glyph so I could say "font-family: Arial, noto-sans" and have a Windows 7 user not download anything while still displaying correctly, if slower, for an XP user.Microsoft Community Chat Helpful resources Unfortunately, there's a huge problem with this because specifying a webfont will cause it to be downloaded at least as soon as an element on the page uses that font and it'd be really nice if there was a way to e.g. It's not uncommon for sites to use a webfont with known support for non-ASCII characters to avoid issues with older operating systems & browsers. As a lower priority, browser support for using the unicode-range property to avoid unnecessary downloads. Simple, robust font load events so you could treat this like any other type of content and make the decision about whether to display an alternative until something finishes loading:Ģ. There are two things which we need to fix this:ġ. Hopefully this saves a few other people 15 minutes of poring over their CSS trying in vain to figure out what isn't working!īrowsers are in a tough spot: when you specify a font, there's no way to programmatically determine how critical that font is to your design (see the FOUT discussion saurik linked above). The fix is (obviously) to explicitly import the versions of the fonts you bold/italicize, but it actually took me a little while to figure out that that (and not some weird CSS issue) was the problem. In past versions of Chrome (or perhaps it's Google Web Fonts that has changed, I'm not sure), I've been able to use and HTML tags around text and my Google fonts have responded accordingly (without my needing to explicitly import bold/italic versions) - but that's no longer the case. weird text-shadow for no reason on what used to appear bold). I noticed in the past week that sites of mine that had imported a font from Google Web Fonts without explicitly specifying to import bold/italics versions too were looking odd (e.g. I don't think this is related to the issue this article talks about, but it may be relevant to Windows Chrome users whose fonts suddenly look bad.
0 kommentar(er)
